因为二十多年前因侵吞公款被劳教罚款
撸卡会不会哪天被算作一种侵吞？
菲佣吗，加大力度
有绿卡的感觉也都要小心了
3 个赞
什么原因？
Dixon’s lawyer, Benjamin Osorio, told Newsweek in an email on Sunday that “she has a single conviction from 2001 that has triggered the issue.” Osorio said Dixon has a non-violent conviction for embezzlement “for which she received 30 days in a halfway house and a $6,400 fine. She was never ordered to serve any active time in a jail or prison. It was the travel that triggered the issue and if she had not traveled, she would not be removable from the United States.”
1 个赞
我觉着可能不是因为这个 不过等后续吧
只是一种没有到期的签证而已 
最近 Reddit 上绿卡被搞的明显变多了
原来是有案底～ 别紧张 
She was never ordered to serve any active time in a jail or prison.
关于驱逐法律，是否驱逐不是看是否服了实刑，是看他的那个罪名的性质以及最高可以判多长时间。哪怕是判在家里待着，只要他这个罪名是 CIMT 是能判一年（含）以上的，就能驱逐。
(i) Crimes of moral turpitude
Any alien who-
(II) is convicted of a crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed,
is deportable.
就像 JD 说的“ green card holders can’t stay in US permanently”
4 个赞
感觉可能ICE知道上庭也会被dismiss，但为了KPI故意搞一下。
2 个赞
还要是10年内的吧。她2001年的conviction。
Any alien who-
(I) is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude committed within five years (or 10 years in the case of an alien provided lawful permanent resident status under section 1255(j) of this title) after the date of admission, and
(II) is convicted of a crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed,
对，就是单纯被 flag 了。我认为 ICE 可能这么想：犯罪了就得驱逐，他们也不知道有 10 年 5 年这些规定，不管 3 7 21 抓起来再说。
1 个赞
再过是不是归化的公民也要被遣返了
需要联邦法官 denaturalization
1 个赞
如果执法人员连这个规定都不知道，那要怎么去抓人呢？
虽然 ICE 的执法标准没有刑事案件那么严格，但最起码，也得是确定某人符合被逮捕的条件，才能去抓人
1 个赞
但是美国的现实就是，执法人员的自由裁量权很大，可以先抓人再放人，被抓的人受到多大的影响，概不负责
4 个赞
东大西大通用：“你一讲法治我都觉得好笑”
18 个赞
这正是这个案件的关注点。如果那个人真没其他问题的话，那ICE是故意的，还是不小心的？
1 个赞
还是双本安全点