美国这人口分布修铁路你是想亏死政府吗 
1 个赞
能顺便让美国重回塑料袋时代吗？每次在instacart上买东西就被迫买几个布袋，现在家里布袋堆积成山了，只好扔垃圾用，也不环保啊
其实环保就是个促进浪费的生意。
不促进消耗和使用怎么挣钱
2 个赞
这是州的问题。我现在在rio，las vegas，内华达这边还是传统的塑料袋，也免费，但是我觉得确实浪费很大，也很怀疑都能合理处理
纯吐槽，EO滥用到底是从哪个总统开始的
+1 纸吸管太难用 有些玉米淀粉做的可降解塑料吸管就不错而且质量比一般的塑料管好
1 个赞
感觉塑料吸管喝和纸吸管没啥区别啊，有这必要吗？ 
Here’s a breakdown of the number of Executive Orders (EOs) per president per term, organized by political party:
Republican Party
- Donald Trump (2nd term, 2025-present): 27 EOs in just 18 days (as of February 7, 2025)
- Donald Trump (1st term, 2017-2021): 220 EOs
- George W. Bush (2001-2009): 291 EOs
- George H. W. Bush (1989-1993): 166 EOs
- Ronald Reagan (1981-1989): 381 EOs
- Gerald Ford (1974-1977): 169 EOs
- Richard Nixon (1969-1974): 346 EOs
- Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961): 484 EOs
Democratic Party
- Joe Biden (2021-2025): 160 EOs
- Barack Obama (2009-2017): 276 EOs
- Bill Clinton (1993-2001): 364 EOs
- Jimmy Carter (1977-1981): 320 EOs
- Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969): 325 EOs
- John F. Kennedy (1961-1963): 214 EOs
- Harry S. Truman (1945-1953): 907 EOs
- Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-1945): 3,727 EOs
Analysis
-
Average EOs per term:
- Republicans: 260 EOs per term
- Democrats: 787 EOs per term
-
Highest number of EOs:
- Republican: Ronald Reagan with 381 EOs over two terms
- Democrat: Franklin D. Roosevelt with 3,727 EOs over three full terms and part of a fourth
-
Lowest number of EOs (excluding partial terms):
- Republican: George H. W. Bush with 166 EOs in one term
- Democrat: Barack Obama with 276 EOs over two terms
-
Recent trends:
- Both parties have shown a general decrease in the number of EOs issued per term in recent decades, with some exceptions.
- Joe Biden issued fewer EOs (160) in his single term compared to his immediate predecessors.
-
Historical context:
- The use of EOs has varied greatly throughout U.S. history, with earlier presidents issuing far fewer than modern presidents.
- The average number of EOs per year for the last 10 presidents (since 1969) is approximately 67.
It’s important to note that the number of EOs doesn’t necessarily reflect their impact or significance. Some presidents may issue fewer but more consequential orders, while others may issue many orders of lesser importance. Additionally, the political and social context of each era can greatly influence the number and nature of EOs issued.
2 个赞
非常有 纸吸管喝得慢一点就会软了 尤其是热饮的粗管 经常喝一半就不行了
2 个赞
short answer 罗斯福新政开始的，各种eo绕开国会，一堆eo违宪
说实话这玩意就是扯淡。分解完的microplastics反而对环境更不友好。当然我不太清楚玉米淀粉塑料他还掺了些别的什么
1 个赞
纸吸管既不环保也不安全泡一段时间就软了，当时是谁为了环保强制美国人把塑料吸管换纸吸管的来着？
用纸还是塑料都应该是市场和消费者决定。
2 个赞
要重归也是减少政府环保补贴吧，为什么泥潭这么多觉得美国政府应该禁止纸吸管的？跟国内某些人自己讨厌韩流然后发帖支持限韩令的有啥区别？
那就不叫可降解了，
主要现在biodegradable plastic很多都是这种极其扯淡的东西。玉米淀粉似乎还好一些，但我不敢说他有多好
没用对东西，真正可降解材料最后都是分解成二氧化碳，水和biomass的，淀粉就属于这类，但是改性淀粉不行
1 个赞
国内是啥样的吸管了
我觉得麦当劳现在那个新吸管就很好